For banks with an agent in pilot or production

Does your agent give the same answer twice?

A four-week, independent test of one document-heavy agent, such as a credit-scoring or loan-review agent: where its answers drift, whether it agrees with your past decisions, and what it needs before you rely on it.

Talk to us
Why this, why now

Teams building agents for credit memos and loan files hit the same wall: run the same file twice and the score changes. The numbers hold; the judgment calls (sponsor experience, covenant strength, environmental risk) do not. Without a known-right answer, nobody can say which run to trust, and the loan committee is left to decide whether the agent helps.

Many of these agents are built in the business, outside model risk. Testing one carefully, before go-live, is cheaper than defending it after. Our method comes from testing AI agents used in audit with Big Four firms.

What you receive

Consistency profile

Which factors drift, by how much, and how often the drift would change a decision. Stable inputs separated from the judgments that move.

Agreement with past decisions

How the agent's answers compare with what your committee actually decided, and where it disagrees for reasons worth hearing.

Evidence review

Whether the agent's traces show what it read and why, and whether a reviewer could check its work in the time they have.

Gap register

What the agent needs to be tested and monitored, including the context a human reviewer used to supply, written so engineering can act on it.

Decision: verify, fix, constrain or retire

One recommendation with the evidence behind it, ready for model risk or the loan committee.

How the four weeks work

1. Scope and sample

Pick the agent and workflow, gather past files with final decisions, walk through who reviews what.

2. Rerun and trace

Repeated runs on the same files, trace review, interviews with the people who sign off.

3. Score

Consistency by factor, agreement with past decisions, midpoint readout.

4. Decide

Verify, fix, constrain or retire; gap register; final readout.

From the bank

One agent in pilot or production, and its owner. 10–20 past files with their final decisions. On-site or screen-share access to run the agent and see its traces. 30–45 minutes with two or three reviewers. A sponsor in model risk, credit risk or the business.

First consistency results at week 2. A decision on the agent at week 4.

Yours on day 30

A repeatable test set built from your own files. Rerun it on every new version of the agent, with or without us, and apply the same method to the next agent.

Building or tuning the agent, production data extraction, platform integration. Reins AI retains its methods and Simthetic technology.

Have an agent whose answers move? Send us one workflow and we'll show you where.

Talk to us